Assuming makes an Ass out of me and you.
I’d rather be the ass with historical and scientific proof than the ass who sticks his fingers in his ears. ^_^
It’s not Proof, it’s nice circumstantial evidence, but ti’s not proof. And there is reasons courts don’t convict based on Circumstantial evidence. Or are you also one of those people who complains abut Casey Anthony being acquitted?
I’m pretty sure that if you presented DNA evidence showing that somebody is related to somebody else, it means that both people are related. No, they are not conclusively father and son. However, they are still related in some shape or form. She still had a baby who was related to Jefferson which implies—no, SAYS something terrible. Even if Jefferson never touched that woman, somebody did who was related to him. If Sally’s other children weren’t his, they still passed for white which means that they still more than likely had a white father or fathers. None of these men probably asked for her consent. That is what you should have a problem with.
I’m approving of nothing that did Happen